![]() |
Provider Notice: 05-065 Original Issue Date: March 29, 2005 FROM: Medicare Communications SUBJECT: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Service-Specific Probe Review This bulletin is to be shared with all managerial staff and health practitioners who are responsible for coding, billing, and submitting medical records. Additional copies may be downloaded from our web site at: www.highmarkmedicareservices.com. This bulletin has been updated. Please refer to Hospital Notice 07-007. Purpose The purpose of this notice is to inform the provider community of the results surrounding a service-specific probe review of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) admissions, conducted by Highmark Medicare Services (Highmark Medicare Services). The information in this notice is also intended to reduce provider denials and to decrease the claims-error rate. Regulations Medicare coverage regulations stipulate that to be paid by Medicare, health care services must be considered "reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member." The Social Security Act 1862(a)(1)(A) prohibits payment for services that are not medically reasonable and necessary. The Social Security Act 1833(e) prohibits payment if sufficient supporting documentation is not provided to Medicare. Section1886 (j) defines IRF payment. Additionally, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Publication 100-2, Chapter 1, Section 110 defines inpatient hospital stays for rehabilitation care. Highmark Medicare Services (Highmark Medicare Services) routinely performs data analysis as required by CMS. Based on this analysis, a decision is made to review a sample number of medical records to assess that guidelines / regulations are being met for the services billed. On October 29, 2004, all Highmark Medicare Services IRF service providers were notified that a limited sample of claims would be requested for review. IRF Service-Specific Probe Review Summary The sample of medical records reviewed by Highmark Medicare Services clinicians in October 2004, again revealed that the major deficiencies noted during this service-specific probe review were:
In comparison to a previous probe that was completed in January 2004, there was a significant increase in compliance with receiving the needed documentation to properly review the medical record for medical necessity. Still some providers continued to not meet this requirement set forth by the Social Security Act 1833(e). The providers did not supply the needed therapy evaluations, the therapy times or units to support “hours” of therapy, the IRF PAI or FIM scores to support the HIPPS code and / or H&P’s, pre-assessments or progress notes. The IRF probe findings revealed the major reason for denial was due to lack of medical necessity/ reasonableness per the Social Security Act 1862 (a)(1)(A). The medical review process found that a majority of the IRF admissions were for unilateral humeral, knee or hip fractures status post surgeries of the affected limb. Also, de-conditioning / debility were among the reasons for the IRF admissions. The documentation in the medical records did not support the need for intensive multi-disciplinary rehabilitation care for these conditions. Medical Necessity According to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Publication 100-2, Chapter 1, Section 110.1, IRF services must be reasonable and necessary (in terms of efficacy, duration, frequency and amount) for treatment of the patient’s condition, and the services must be relatively intense requiring a multidisciplinary coordinated team approach. It also must be reasonable and necessary to furnish the care on an inpatient hospital basis, rather than in a less intensive facility such as a SNF, or on an outpatient basis. When Highmark Medicare Services clinicians analyzed the medical record, consideration was given to the patient’s medical, surgical, rehabilitation needs and functional impairments. A determination was made whether an IRF stay was reasonable and necessary at that point in time for that unique patient. Some of the criteria used to determine medical necessity include:
|
|
|
© 2005-2008. All rights are reserved.
|
||